Month: November 2023

Navigating the ‘Neutrality’ Quagmire: Unpacking Subhash Desai v. Principal Secretary and the Nabam Rebia Conundrum  

The recent judgment of the Supreme Court in Subhash Desai v. Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra & Ors has lately been in news due to its upcoming hearing before a 7-judge-bench. Subhash was set in the context of the political controversy regarding the intra-party dissent and subsequent alleged defections that took place within the Shiv Sena Legislative Party in Maharashtra. This article critically analyses the position propounded in Subhash regarding the reference of Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker, Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly to a larger bench. Ultimately, this article argues that there are several inconsistencies present in the application of the reasons specified for referring Nabam to a larger bench. Further, it contends that the interim measure proposed in Subhash is unconstitutional in nature and thus, should be set aside.

0

Unconstitutionality of Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956- Discrimination in the Order of Inheritance

In this Legislation Review, the Author has explained how Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act violates Articles 14 and 15 of the Indian Constitution, rendering it unconstitutional. This has been done in light of a recent petition to the Supreme Court. While the Act claims that the order of inheritance is based on the proximity of the relationship, Section 15 does not adhere to this principle. This also goes against the principles of justice, equity, and good conscience. Thus a new scheme for Section 15 has been proposed.

0

The Places of Worship Act, 1991: An Enquiry into Constitutionality

The Places of Worship Act was intended to cease communal conflicts over history but it has failed to prevent conflicts such as the Gyanvapi Row. A part of this failure is attributable to the legislature’s omission to succinctly identify the existence of complex religious structures and conflicting historical experiences. This article examines the constitutionality of the Act’s provisions against the backdrop of history and provides an analysis of the ambiguity in the Act that needs rectification to ensure the true realization of justice.

0

Unveiling the expanded scope of “State”: When private entities take public roles

Article 12 of the Indian Constitution defines “State”. In the initial years of India’s independence, the notion of “state” was defined quite narrowly by the Supreme Court of India. It was only later that the Courts took a liberal view while interpreting “State”. Due to privatisation, there are more private organisations and corporations than ever before. It is essential that they fall under the definition of “State” in order to enforce fundamental rights against them and devolve liability in a way that escorts the devolvement of power and authority from traditional bases like governmental organs to private players. This article examines the evolving interpretation of the term “State” in the Indian Constitution in light of increasing privatization. It emphasizes the importance of safeguarding fundamental rights and explains how courts have expanded the definition of “State” to hold private entities accountable.

0

Up ↑