The article examines the Essential Religious Practices Doctrine in India, tracing its evolution, implications, and critiques. It explores how the doctrine, first derived with the intention to protect religious practices with secular and economic connotations, has evolved into an anathema for religious freedom, empowering the Court to decide people’s faith for them. Analysing its impact, the article suggests alternative approaches, emphasizing individual rights and deference to religious groups. It argues for reconsideration of the ERP doctrine due to its potential to undermine religious freedoms and the judiciary's authority, emphasizing the need for the same.