Battling Digital Disinformation: The Imperative of Fact-Checking in a Participatory Democracy (Part II)

Disinformation and misinformation has been earmarked as aย โ€˜global riskโ€™,ย causing โ€˜information pollutionโ€™ย that adversely impacts decision making and socio-economic and politicalย stability.ย Part โ€“ II intends to explore the evolving interpretation of the theory of โ€˜marketplace of ideasโ€™ under Article 19(1)(a) to point out that disinformation and misinformation on government affairs distorts the foundation of democracy, i.e., truth. Accordingly, the article emphasises on the need to fact-check in order to ensure plurality of views based on factually true information, since discourse based on false information makes the citizen's participation in democracy a futile exercise.

Battling Digital Disinformation: The Imperative of Fact-Checking in a Participatory Democracy (Part I)

Disinformation and misinformation has been earmarked as aย โ€˜global riskโ€™,ย causing โ€˜information pollutionโ€™ย that adversely impacts decision making and socio-economic and politicalย stability. In light of this, Part โ€“ I of this Article aims to expplain the imperative and constitutionality of the Fact-Check Unit (FCU) underย Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of the IT Rules, 2021, through a comparativeย study.ย 

Up ↑